This multi-year collaborative project “Moving Beyond the Threshold” set out to interrogate what it means to think historically in the digital age. How do university students and teachers use digital media to transform learning experiences? Do digital approaches present novel ways to engage with key historical concepts? Answers to these questions continue to be important and urgent; large-scale investment in educational resources and technology is based on the assumption that current and future students are or will become digitally literate, and that they know how to use digital media effectively and efficiently in inquiry-led and autonomous learning. There is little evidence to prove, however, that the so-called ‘net generation’ grasp the disciplinary threshold concepts of historical thinking, attain successful learning outcomes through technology-mediated teaching, or achieve the key competencies of critical and creative thinking and citizenship that prepare them for future employment and social engagement. This report-in-progress outlines our early project findings, including the disconnect between technology use and critical thinking.
Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In M. L. Maehr, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 10, pp. 213-250. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Barradell, S., (2013). The identification of threshold concepts: a review of theoretical complexities and methodological challenges. Higher Education, 65(2), 265-276.
Bass, R., & Rosenzweig, R. (2000). Rewiring the History and Social Studies Classroom: Needs, Frameworks, Dangers, and Proposals. Journal of Education, 3, 41-61. Retrieved from http://chnm.gmu.edu/assets/historyessays/e2/rewiringl/html
Belanger, E., (2011). How Now? Historical Thinking, Reflective Teaching, and the Next Generation of History Teachers. Journal of American History, 97(4): 1079-1088.
Blackwell, C., & Martin, T. R. (2009). Technology, Collaboration, and Undergraduate Research. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 3(1). Retrieved from http://digitalhumanities.org/dhg/vol/3/1/000024/000024.html
Bolstad, R., & Gilbert, J. (2008). Disciplining and Drafting, or 21st Century Learning? Rethinking the New Zealand Senior Secondary Curriculum for the Future. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., & McDowall, S. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching: a New Zealand perspective. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Cantu, D. A., & Warren, W. J. (2003). Teaching History in the Digital Classroom. Armonk, NY & London: M.E. Sharpe.
Cohen, D. J., Frisch, M., Gallagher, P., Mintz, S., Sword, K., Taylor, A. M., Thomas, III, W. G., & Turkel, W. (2008). Interchange: The Promise of Digital History. The Journal of American History, 95(2), 452-491.
Cohen, D.J., & Rosenzweig, R. (2006). Digital History. A Guide to Gathering, Preserving, and Presenting the Past on the Web. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Crookston, M. (2006). Digital resources in tertiary education: a survey of New Zealand studies faculty. Unpublished MLIS research project, Victoria University of Wellington.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dougherty, J., & Nawrotzki, K. (Eds.) (2012). Writing History in the Digital Age. University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from http://WritingHistory.trincoll.edu/
Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
Friedman, A.M. (2006). World History Teachers' Use of Digital Primary Sources: The Effect of Training. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(1), 124-141.
Galgano, M. J., Arndt, J. C., & Hyser, R. M. (2013). Doing history: research and writing in the digital age (2nd Ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Gluckman, P. (2012). Submission to the Education and Science Committee on 21st century learning environments and digital literacy. Parliament NZ. Retrieved from http://www.parliament.nz/enNZ/PB/SC/MakeSub/f/9/7/50SCES_SCF_00DBSCH_INQ_11275_1-Inguiry-into-2lst-century-learning.htm
Gold, M.K. (Ed.) (2012). Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.
Greengrass, M., & Hughes, L. M., (Eds.) (2008). The virtual representation of the past. Farnham: Ashgate.
Harcourt, M., Fountain, G. & Sheehan, M. (2011). Historical significance and sites of memory. SET: research Information for Teachers, 2, 26-31.
Harley, D., Henke, J., Lawrence, S., Miller, I., Perciali, I., & Nasatir, D. (2006). Use and Users of Digital Resources: A Focus on Undergraduate Education in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8c43w24h#page-1
Hayles, N. K. (2012). How we think: digital media and contemporary technogenesis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Howson, J., & Sheehan, M. (2012). 'Learning to think historically': Developing disciplinary expertise through internally assessed research projects. In M. Harcourt & M. Sheehan (Eds.), History Matters: Teaching and learning Secondary School History in New Zealand. Wellington: NZCER.
Hughes-Warrington, M., Roe, J., Nye, A., Bailey, M., Peel, M., Russell, P., Laugeson, A., Deacon, D., Kiem, P. & Trent, F. (2009). Historical thinking in higher education: an ALTC discipline-based initiative. Sydney: Macquarie University. Retrieved from
Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from
Johnson, E.M., Cowie, B., & Khoo, E. (2011). Exploring eLearning practices across the disciplines in a university environment. TLRI Summary Report. Retrieved from
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2011). Technology Outlook for New Zealand Tertiary Education 2011-2016. Austin, Texas: New Media Consortium. Retrieved from
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). 2012 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/1ibrary/pdf/HR2012.pdf
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Gray, K., Waycott, J., Judd, T., Bishop, A., Maton, K., Krause, K. & Chang, R. (2009). Educating the net generation: A handbook of findings for policy and practice. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from
Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009) Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing, Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 431-441.
Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. F. & Davies, P. (2005) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): implications for course design and evaluation. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning Diversity and Inclusivity. Oxford: OCSLD.
Land, R., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2010). Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (5): Dynamics of Assessment. In J. H. F, Meyer, R, Land, & C, Baillie (Eds.), Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Land, R. (2011). There could be trouble ahead: using threshold concepts as a tool of analysis. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 175-178.
Lee, P. (2004). Understanding History. In P. Seixas (Ed.), Theorizing Historical Consciousness. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
LÃ©vesque, S. (2008). Thinking Historically. Educating Students for the Twenty-First Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
LÃ©vesque, S. (2006). Learning by 'playing': Engaging Students in Digital History. Canadian Issues/ThÃ¨mes Canadiens, (Fall), 68-71.
LÃ©vesque, S. (2006). Discovering the Past: Engaging Canadian Students in Digital History. Canadian Social Studies, 40(1). Retrieved from http://www.quasar.alberta.ca/css
Levstik, L. S. & Barton, K.C. (2008). Researching history education. Theory, method and context. New York: Routledge.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Manfra, M. M., & Coven, R.M. (2011). A Digital View of History: Drawing and Discussing Models of Historical Concepts. Social Education, 75(2), 102-106.
McDonald, T., & Thornley, C. (2009). Critical literacy for academic success in secondary school: Examining students' use of disciplinary knowledge. Critical Literacy: Theories and Practices, 3(2), 56-68.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge 1 - Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising in Improving Student Learning - Ten Years On. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning Diversity and Inclusivity. Oxford: OCSLD.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R (2005). Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge 2: Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373-388.
Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Davies, P. (2008). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (4): Issues of variation and variability. In R. Land, J.H.F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mintz, S., McNeil, S., & Lienhard, J. (2012). Digital History Project. Retrieved from
Novak, J. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949.
Nye, A., Hughes-Warrington, M., Roe, J., Russell, P., Deacon, D., & Kiem, P. (2011). Exploring historical thinking and agency with undergraduate history students. Studies in Higher Education, 36(7). 763-780.
Nyirubugara, O. (2012). Surfing the past: digital learners in the history class. Leiden: Sidestone Press.
Oppenheimer, T. (2003). The flickering mind: The false promise of technology in the classroom and how learning can be saved. New York: Random House.
O'Riley, B., & 21st Century Learning Reference Group (2014). Future-focused learning in connected communities. Retrieved from
Peter, M., & Harlow, A. (2012-14). Re-envisioning tertiary teaching and learning of difficult concepts: How "threshold concepts" afford understanding of problematic ideas. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/tlri-research/research-progress/postschool-sector/re-envisioning-tertiary-teaching-and-learning
Quinlan, K. M, Male, S., Baillie, C., Stamboulis, A., Fill, J., & Jaffer, Z. (2013). Methodological challenges in researching threshold concepts: a comparative analysis of three projects. Higher Education, 66, 585-601. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9623-y
Ringrose, D. M. (2001). Beyond Amusement: Reflections on Multimedia, Pedagogy, and Digital Literacy in the History Seminar. The History Teacher, 34(2), 209-228.
Rosenzweig, R. (2011). Clio wired: the future of the past in the digital age. New York: Columbia University Press.
Roy, L., Lilley, S. C., & Luehrsen, V. (2011). Indigenous Cultural Models in Information Literacy Delivery including Programmes for MÄori and Pasifika students at New Zealand Universities. Paper presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 77th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, San Juan, Puerto Rico. 13-18 August 2011. Retrieved from http://conference.ifla.org/sites/default/files/files/papers/ifla77/94-roy-en.pdf
Rutner, J., & Schonfield, R.C. (2012). Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Historians. ITHAKA S+R. Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/supporting-changing-research-practices-historians
Seefeldt, D., & Thomas, III, W. G. (2009). What is Digital History? A Look at Some Exemplar Projects. University of Nebraska, Faculty Publications, Department of History. Paper 98. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historyfacpub/98
Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2012). The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts. Toronto: Nelson Education.
Sheehan, M., & TLRI Research Team. (2013). Thinking Historically. The role of NCEA research projects in motivating history students to develop disciplinary expertise. Retrieved from
Shep, S. J. (2009). Using Social Networking Tools to Enhance Collaborative Learning Unpublished research project for PGCertHE, Victoria University of Wellington.
Shep, S. J., Sheehan, M., & McKinley, D. (2013). Exploring Digital Technologies and Historical Thinking in Undergraduate learning and teaching at Victoria University of Wellington, VUW Learning and Teaching Development Project. Retrieved from http://wtap.vuw.ac.nz/wordpress/digital-history/research/ http://www.cad.vuw.ac.nz/wiki/index.php/Exploring_Digital_ Technologies_and_Historical_Thinking)
Stearns, P. N., Seixas, P., & Wineburg, S. (Eds.) (2000) Knowing, Teaching and Learning History. New York: NYU Press.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sturtevant, E. G., & Linek, W. M. (2004). Content literacy: An inquiry-based case approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Swan, K., & Losascio, D. (2008). Evaluating Alignment of Technology and Primary Source Use Within a History Classroom. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 175-186.
Tertiary Education Strategy 2014-2019. (2014). NZ Ministry of Education and Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment.
Trask, D. (2002). Did the Sans-Culottes Wear Nikes? The Impact of Electronic Media on the Understanding and Teaching of History. The History Teacher, 35(4), 473-489.
Tredinnick, L. (2013). The making of history; remediating historicized experience. In T. Weller (Ed.), History in the Digital Age. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
VanSledright, B.A. (1996). Closing the gap between school and disciplinary history? Historian as high school history teacher. In J, Brody (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 6: Teaching and Learning History, pp. 257-289. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Zepke, N. (2013). Threshold Concepts and Student Engagement: Revisiting Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Active Learning in Education, 14(2), 97-107.