Threshold Concepts in Academic Practice: Engagement with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning


This paper investigates the existence and nature of threshold concepts as experienced by a group of twenty-one teaching-focused academics, from life science departments in UK universities. Individuals were invited to take part in the study and asked to fill in a survey about their roles as academics. Participants in the study were interviewed about their experiences with the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), using a graph generated from their responses to the survey as a mediating artefact. Interview transcripts were analysed and comments categorized according to Trigwell, Martin, Benjamin & Prosser’s (2000) Model of Scholarship. Threshold Concepts were identified in three out of four of Trigwell et al’s dimensions of scholarship, mainly at the level moving from the disciplinary to the mainstream context of education. In addition, other threshold concepts were identified that were outside Trigwell et al’s (2000) model of scholarship. These findings have implications for academics engaging with SoTL, their audiences, and academic developers delivering postgraduate teaching qualifications in higher education.



Allen, M. N., & Field, P. A. (2005). Scholarly Teaching and Scholarship of Teaching: Noting the Difference. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 2(1). doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1094

Antman, L., & Olsson, T. (2007). A Two-Dimensional Matrix Model for Analysing Scholarly Approaches to Teaching and Learning. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning through Teaching, pp. 54–72. Oxford: OCSLD.

Boshier, R. (2009). Why is the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning such a hard sell? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 1–15.

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bunnell, S. L., & Bernstein, D. J. (2012). Overcoming Some Threshold Concepts in Scholarly Teaching. The Journal of Faculty Development, 26(3), 14–18.

Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Erlbaum.

Fan, X. (2001). Statistical Significance and Effect Size in Education Research: Two Sides of a Coin. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 275–282.

Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hutchings, P. (2007). Theory: The Elephant in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Room. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1–4.

Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. E. (1999). The Scholarship of Teaching: New Elaborations, New Developments. Change, 31(5), 10–15.

Kreber, C. (2002). Teaching Excellence, Teaching Expertise, and the Scholarship of Teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 27(1), 5-23.

Kreber, C. (2005). Reflection on teaching and the scholarship of teaching: Focus on science instructors. Higher Education, 50, 323–359.

Kreber, C., & Castleden, H. (2009). Reflection on teaching and epistemological structure: reflective and critically reflective processes in ‘pure/soft’ and ‘pure/hard’ fields. Higher Education, 57(4), 509–531. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9158-9

Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.

McLean, J. (2009). Triggering Engagement in SoTL through Threshold Concepts. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), Article 24. doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030224

Meyer, J.H.F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning - Theory and Practice Ten Years On, pp. 412-424. Oxford: OCSLD.

Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5

Osgood, C. E., & Suci, G. J. (1969). Factor analysis of meaning. In J.G. Snider & C.E. Osgood (Eds.), Semantic differential Technique: A sourcebook of basic studies of the origin, theoretical basis, methodology, validity, and specific uses of an important new tool for social and behavioural scientists, pp. 42–55. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, USA: University of Illinois Press.

Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6-11.

Smith, K. (2012). An Investigation of student learning using threshold concepts in a first year cell biology course (M.A Thesis). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from:

Taylor, C., Tzoumis, V., Meyer, J. H. F., & Ross, P. (2012). Using a mixed methods approach to explore student understanding of hypotheses in Biology. In Proceedings of the National Academy’s Sixth Annual Conference and the Fourth Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference, June 28-29 2012, pp. 83–87. Trinity College, University of Dublin: NAIRTL. Retrieved from:

Times Higher Education. (2008, January 3). A lesser breed? Retrieved 21 April 2013 from:

Timmermans, J. A. (2013). Identifying threshold concepts in the careers of educational developers. International Journal for Academic Development. 19(4), 305-317, doi:10.1080/1360144X.2014.895731

Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of Teaching: a model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 155–168.

Vajoczki, S., Savage, P., Martin, L., Borin, P., & Kustra, E. (2011). Good Teachers, Scholarly Teachers and Teachers Engaged in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A Case Study from McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 1-27, doi: 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2011.1.2

Webb, A. (2014). Threshold Concepts and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Paper presented at the 5th Biennial Threshold Concepts International Conference, 9-11 July 2014, Durham University: UK.

Authors retain the copyright for their work, while granting the journal the exclusive right of first publication. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.